Friday, June 27, 2008

Argument from Consciousness

I just learned that J.P.Moreland has a new book out. (J.P. will be the featured speaker at an apologetics event to be held in Bend this fall, sponsored by The Apologetics Guild.) The book is titled Consciousness and the Existence of God, and its central thesis is the "argument from consciousness."

I can't yet give you my review of the book (I'll plan to read it soon), so here's an excerpt from Amazon.com...
As mentioned in the introduction, many believe that finite minds provide evidence of a Divine Mind as their creator. If we limit our options to theism and naturalism, it is hard to see how finite consciousness could result from the rearrangement of brute matter; it is easier to see how a Conscious Being could produce finite consciousness since, according to theism, the Basic Being is Himself conscious. Thus, the theist has no need to explain how consciousness can come from materials bereft of it. Consciousness is there from the beginning. To put the point differently, in the beginning there were either particles or the Logos. If you start with particles and just rearrange them according to physical law, you won’t get mind. If you start with Logos, you already have mind.

3 comments:

Steven Carr said...

How does consciouness exist?

Naturalist - That is a difficult question.

Moreland - It just does.

Not a convincing answer.

'Thus, the theist has no need to explain how consciousness can come from materials bereft of it.'

Really? So how does an unconcsious human being regain consciousness?

Does God work a miracle every time somebody comes out of the operating room?

Does God have to remember not to restore consciousness until the anaesthetic wears off, or else people will be able to see a miracle?

Steven Carr said...

MORELAND
If you start with particles and just rearrange them according to physical law, you won’t get mind.

CARR
Gosh! This guy Moreland can tell us everything that can ever happen in a universe of amazing size and complexity.

What a genius!

Rick Gerhardt said...

Steven:

Thanks for reading. I'll respond to your comments in the body of the blog, rather than here in the comments section. That way others can benefit from the exchange (many don't bother to read the comments).

Thanks again.