tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6410615559824660051.post8494157049094837979..comments2023-10-18T05:31:21.249-07:00Comments on Peregrinations: EpistemologyRick Gerhardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10478878021692544533noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6410615559824660051.post-28424087024894118762009-09-19T19:56:38.623-07:002009-09-19T19:56:38.623-07:00David:
I agree with you completely. Thanks for r...David:<br /><br />I agree with you completely. Thanks for reading (and interacting).Rick Gerhardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10478878021692544533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6410615559824660051.post-3838192154098213482009-09-12T04:37:20.791-07:002009-09-12T04:37:20.791-07:00Rick,
What I said/what I should have said.
I am i...Rick,<br /><br />What I said/what I should have said.<br />I am in full agreement with your explanation of the universe and your explanation of science. When I wrote to you about my concerns about "ex nihilo" I was not arguing for an eternal universe. My concern is about this thing called "nothing" that coexisted with God. God created. He did not take this entity called "nothing" and fashioned it into something. God created. We casually toos around the term "nothing" when we mean something. When our spouse hears us muttering and asks, "what was that?" We answer "nothing". When we check the mailbox and there is no mail in the box we tell our spouse that "nothing" came in the mail. Yes, this is probably a nonsensical argument. "Nothing" is impervious to our five senses. I am suggesting that God's fingerprint is found in everything our five senses recognize. <br />I embrace the singularity that happened some 14 billion years ago. I want to place the emphasis on God and not on "nothing".<br /><br />David DoreAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com